![donate us generously donate us generously](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/7b/c7/64/7bc7647b3e6fe9989802083b8c17234b.jpg)
![donate us generously donate us generously](https://www.minnpost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/imagecache/article_detail/images/articles/RecoveryBikeShop640.jpg)
![donate us generously donate us generously](https://creativehomekeeper.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/giving-generously-this-year.jpg)
Data from two further behavioral studies (Study 2: N = 156, 18-89 years Study 3: N = 342, 19-88 years) that were analyzed using Bayesian statistics provided evidence that older adults are not more prosocial than younger and middle-aged adults when donating a small amount of their time (in service of a donation to charity). However, these differences depended on the domain of the donation. Conceptually replicating findings from Hubbard, Harbaugh, Srivastava, Degras, and Mayr (2016) on monetary donations, results suggest that non-monetary prosociality also increases with age. Are older adults also more prosocial when donating a non-monetary resource that is of equal or even higher value for them compared to younger age groups? A first study (N = 160, 20-74 years) combined data from self-report measures, affective responses, and hypothetical donation decisions to compute a single prosociality factor. However, on average older adults hold a significant advantage in financial and material assets compared to younger adults, effectively lowering the subjective cost of small monetary donations. The majority of this research was conducted using monetary donations as outcome measures. Empirical evidence suggests that self-reported prosociality and donations increase with age.